The Echinoid Directory

Proraster Lambert, 1895, p. 256

[=Sanfilippaster Checchia-Rispoli 1932, p. 313, type species S. geayi Cottreau, 1908, p. 26 ]

Diagnostic Features
  • Test ovate with deep anterior sulcus; posterior face truncate. Test depressed in profile; ambitus rounded.
  • Apical disc ethmophract with four gonopores; posterior of centre.
  • Ambulacrum III deeply sunken aborally; wide and with vertical walls which converge towards the ambitus so that the groove is pinched adambitally. Pore-pairs uniserial.
  • Petals sunken; anterior petals long and flexed anteriorly; posterior petals less than half the length of the anterior petals and only weakly depressed.
  • Ambulacral zones strongly pinched immediately beneath petals where they pass through the fasciole.
  • Peristome close to anterior border and facing forward into frontal groove. Labrum projecting to cover peristome in oral view.
  • Plastron plating with triangular labral plate and symmetrical sternal plates. Episternal plates offset.
  • Periproct on posterior truncate face.
  • Peripetalous fasciole present.
Distribution
Upper Cretaceous (Upper Campanian to Maastrichtian), Europe, former Soviet Union, North Africa, Middle East.
Name gender masculine
Type
Schizaster atavus Arnaud in Cotteau, 1883, p. 13, by original designation.
Species Included
  • P. atavus (Arnaud, in Cotteau, 1883); Campanian, France.
  • P. geayi Cottreau, 1908; Upper Campanian and Maastrichtian, Madagascar, Arabian Peninsula, Libya.
  • P. morgani (Cotteau & Gauthier, 1895); Campanian or Maastrichtian, Iran.
  • P. centrosus (Cotteau & Gauthier, 1895); Campanian or Maastrichtian, Iran.
  • P. douvillei (Gauthier, 1902); Senonian, Iran.
  • P. granti Kier, 1972; Campanian, Saudi Arabia.
Classification and/or Status

Spatangoida, Hemiasterina, Hemiasteridae.

Monophyletic?

Remarks

Proraster resembles Holanthus in having highly pinched ambulacral zones beneath the petals, but that genus has only a shallow anterior groove. The deeply sunken frontal groove and flexed anterior petals make Proraster look like a Brisaster or Paraster, but it is distinguished from both by its ethmophract apical disc and absence of a latero-anal fasciole.

Kier, P. M. 1972. Tertiary and Mesozoic echinoids of Saudi Arabia. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 10, 1-242.

Lambert, J. 1895, Essai d'une monographie du genere Micraster et notes sur quelques échinides. Pp. 149-267. In de GROSSOUVRE, A. (ed.) Recherches sur la Craie supérieure. Mémoires du Service de la Carte géologique de France 1 (Chapitre IV).

Smith, A. B. 1995. Late Campanian-Maastrichtian echinoids from the United Arab Emirates-Oman borders region. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Geology Series) 51, 121-240.